In this letter, Peter Swallow, the Labour MP for Bracknell, says he is pushing for a fair deal for pensioners, who are seeing inflation 'erode their life savings'. Mr Swallow writes:
A secure retirement is something everyone rightly expects. For decades, many contributed to defined benefit schemes, trusting in a secure future.
But for many with pre-1997 defined benefit pensions, a lack of discretionary increases to their pension contributions has left them in a precarious position, watching as inflation erodes the value of their life savings. This is more than just a financial issue; it's about fairness and delivering on a promise made to a generation of hard-working people.
This is particularly an issue in Bracknell where one of the largest schemes affected was run by HP, who employed hundreds in our town. That’s why I have repeatedly raised this issue in Parliament and worked closely with the Pensions Minister to push for a solution. We have to make sure our financial system works for people, not against them.
With many defined benefit schemes now in surplus, the question has rightly shifted from how to cover deficits to how to share this newfound wealth. While some employers, having made significant contributions to stabilise these schemes, wish to recoup some of their expenditure, I firmly believe that the first priority must be to ensure that members who have gone without increases are given a long-overdue share of this success.
In December, I asked the Pensions Minister to ensure that the Pensions Regulator undertook the necessary research to fully understand the scope of the problem. We needed to move beyond anecdotes and gather clear data. I was pleased to hear the Minister confirm that this essential research was underway, laying the groundwork for evidence-based action.
I then met with the Pensions Minister in March to reinforce the urgency of the issue. The Minister’s message was clear and welcome: where schemes are in surplus and no discretionary increases have been paid, the right thing to do is to provide them. This was a crucial recognition at the highest level of government that a moral obligation exists alongside the legal one.
The Pension Schemes Bill, which allows employers to reclaim surpluses subject to trustee approval, is a powerful tool. It creates a mechanism for negotiation, empowering trustees to make surplus extraction conditional on securing long-awaited increases for pre-1997 benefits.
While some would have preferred more prescriptive legislation, there are significant practical concerns about a single law applying to all pension pots in a uniform way. By strengthening the hand of trustees, the Government has empowered those closest to the scheme to secure the best possible outcome for members.
To ensure this power is used effectively, I have written to the Trustees of the HPE Pensions Scheme, urging them to use their new authority under the Bill to negotiate for an increase for their members. And I will soon be meeting with the Pensions Minister again to raise the specific situations of constituents from the HPE and Digital Pensions Schemes.
This is a significant step forward. The focus is now on delivering tangible results for those who have waited too long. I will continue to push for promises made to our pensioners to be fairly delivered.
Share