DOZENS of vulnerable Bracknell residents have been left in limbo for more than three months while carers applied to strip them of their freedom.

The mental health charity Mind says the lack of legal safeguards for people subject to deprivation of liberty applications constitutes a “disgraceful breach of human rights”.

Hospitals and care homes must apply to councils for permission to restrict freedom of anyone deemed to lack the mental capacity to make decisions about their care, such as those with dementia or mental health problems.

READ THIS: Wokingham elderly residents struggle to get on Reading Bus routes during South East Water project

There is currently a legal maximum time limit of 21 days for applications to be processed – but experts say insufficient funding combined with huge demand has left councils across England struggling to cope.

Bracknell Forest Borough Council had 120 applications outstanding at the end of March 2019, the latest NHS Digital figures show, of which 60 (50 per cent) had been sitting in limbo for at least three months.

Once an application has been approved, the person subject to it is granted legal protections, including the right to appeal the decision and have the restrictions imposed on them regularly reviewed.

But experts have raised concerns that people with live applications are being denied these protections – and in some cases may be facing restrictions which will be considered unnecessary.

ALSO READ: Bracknell rapist sentenced to 21 years for sexually assaulting women in their sleep

Alison Cobb, specialist policy advisor at Mind, said: "It is a disgraceful breach of human rights that people are having their freedom taken away without legal safeguards while they wait a year or longer for their application to be processed.

"This can mean that they have to endure unnecessary delays to being placed in the best care setting for them, which would help to protect them from harm."

In Bracknell Forest, 30 per cent of all the applications completed in 2018-19 resulted in the deprivation of liberty being refused – 85 cases in total.

Of these, 5 were because the criteria had not been met, while 45 were the result of the person's circumstances having changed while the application was processed.

The average processing time for all completed applications was 145 days – almost 21 weeks – while the longest took 836 days.

Only 8 per cent of applications were completed within the statutory 21 days.

Polly Sweeney, chair of the mental health and learning disability committee at the Law Society, said she had come across cases with significant delays in which the person was found to have had sufficient mental capacity all along.

READ AGAIN: Crime 'EPIDEMIC' as yet more catalytic converter thefts

However, Thom Wilson, assistant director for commissioning at Bracknell Forest Council, said: "As a council we are committed to safeguarding our most vulnerable residents at all times and take our duty to apply Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLs) very seriously.

“The awareness of, and demand for, DoLs authorisations has changed significantly over recent years and placed all councils under significant pressure. Bracknell Forest already completes DoLs authorisations faster than the national average, but we are always aspiring to improve on turnaround times*.

“Contrary to the implications made, a decision about the best care setting for individuals is based on a thorough assessment of their needs, not the application of DoLs.

Furthermore, should any individual wish to object to their placement before the DoLs process is finalised, there are robust processes in place whereby the placement provider is statutorily obliged to notify us immediately. In these circumstances, an urgent process is applied.

“The system is being replaced by Liberty Protection Safeguards later in the year and we are already working proactively to deliver this.”

The number of applications received by councils across England has rocketed following a 2014 Supreme Court ruling lowering the threshold for what constitutes a ‘deprivation of liberty’, rising from 13,715 in 2013-14 to 240,455 last year.

There were 131,350 outstanding applications across England at the end of March – 39 per cent of them more than a year old.

The current arrangements – described as "not fit for purpose" by the Local Government Association – is set to be replaced by a simplified system later in 2020, which will shift some of the responsibility away from councils.

Ms Sweeney said concerns remained about funding however, while Mind said it was crucial the Government did not replace "one broken system with another".

A Department of Health and Social Care spokesman, said: "We are committed to ensuring people who lack capacity and may be at risk of being unlawfully deprived of their liberty are cared for safely and compassionately, which is why we are reforming the current system by introducing Liberty Protection Safeguards.

"Liberty Protection Safeguards will improve protections for these groups, while providing regular reviews of their care and bolster the right to independent advocacy."